KM MZBS Karkonosze 2016 - finał 4: S Janiak | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | B Leśniak-M Rajca,*-J Wiese | 1 | WE | 2 | E | 9 | +1 | +140 | 57.14% | 57.14% | ||
B Leśniak-M Rajca,*-J Wiese | 2 | WE | 3 | N | 7 | = | -600 | 64.29% | 60.71% | |||
B Leśniak-M Rajca,*-J Wiese | 3 | WE | 3 | S | A | -2 | +100 | 85.71% | 69.05% | |||
2 | S Zimniak-W Siuda,*-J Wiese | 4 | WE | 3 | S | Q | +1 | -170 | 35.71% | 60.71% | ||
S Zimniak-W Siuda,*-J Wiese | 5 | WE | 6 | E | 9 | -2 | -100 | 0.00% | 48.57% | |||
S Zimniak-W Siuda,*-J Wiese | 6 | WE | 3 | W | J | +2 | +660 | 57.14% | 50.00% | |||
3 | E Gąska-M Czerniawski,*-J Wiese | 7 | WE | 2 | N | J | +1 | -140 | 0.00% | 42.86% | ||
E Gąska-M Czerniawski,*-J Wiese | 8 | WE | 4 | N | 3 | -1 | +50 | 71.43% | 46.43% | |||
E Gąska-M Czerniawski,*-J Wiese | 9 | WE | 3× | W | A | -2 | -500 | 0.00% | 41.27% | |||
4 | E Szafraniec-J Kurianowicz,*-J Wiese | 10 | WE | 3 | E | 5 | +1 | +630 | 64.29% | 43.57% | ||
E Szafraniec-J Kurianowicz,*-J Wiese | 11 | WE | 4× | W | Q | -1 | -100 | 21.43% | 41.56% | |||
E Szafraniec-J Kurianowicz,*-J Wiese | 12 | WE | 3 | E | A | -1 | -50 | 28.57% | 40.48% | |||
5 | *-J Wiese,M Rój-J Romańczyk | 13 | NS | 3 | E | 6 | = | -600 | 57.14% | 41.76% | ||
*-J Wiese,M Rój-J Romańczyk | 14 | NS | 6 | S | K | = | +920 | 78.57% | 44.39% | |||
*-J Wiese,M Rój-J Romańczyk | 15 | NS | 1 | N | 8 | -2 | -200 | 21.43% | 42.86% | |||
6 | *-J Wiese,J Molenda-A Winkler | 16 | NS | 4 | W | 7 | +2 | -690 | 64.29% | 44.20% | ||
*-J Wiese,J Molenda-A Winkler | 17 | NS | 3 | S | 10 | +1 | +170 | 71.43% | 45.80% | |||
*-J Wiese,J Molenda-A Winkler | 18 | NS | 4 | S | 5 | = | +130 | 50.00% | 46.03% | |||
7 | *-J Wiese,Z Patreuha-J Patreuha | 19 | NS | 3 | N | 3 | -1 | -50 | 71.43% | 47.37% | ||
*-J Wiese,Z Patreuha-J Patreuha | 20 | NS | 3 | S | 7 | = | +600 | 71.43% | 48.57% | |||
*-J Wiese,Z Patreuha-J Patreuha | 21 | NS | 3 | S | K | +1 | +170 | 4.29% | 46.46% | |||
8 | B Nowakowski-A Szuszkiewicz,*-J Wiese | 22 | WE | 3× | S | A | +1 | -570 | 21.43% | 45.32% | ||
B Nowakowski-A Szuszkiewicz,*-J Wiese | 23 | WE | 3 | E | 8 | = | +110 | 14.29% | 43.98% | |||
B Nowakowski-A Szuszkiewicz,*-J Wiese | 24 | WE | 4 | N | 9 | -1 | +50 | 50.00% | 44.23% | |||
9 | *-J Wiese,A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak | 25 | NS | 5× | N | A | -4 | -800 | 28.57% | 43.60% | ||
*-J Wiese,A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak | 26 | NS | 4 | S | 10 | +1 | +650 | 50.00% | 43.85% | |||
*-J Wiese,A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak | 27 | NS | 3 | E | 8 | -3 | +150 | 85.71% | 45.40% | |||
10 | *-J Wiese,A Poznysz-Z Ciereszko | 28 | NS | 6 | W | Q | = | -990 | 7.14% | 44.03% | ||
*-J Wiese,A Poznysz-Z Ciereszko | 29 | NS | 3 | S | 5 | +2 | +660 | 78.57% | 45.22% | |||
*-J Wiese,A Poznysz-Z Ciereszko | 30 | NS | 2 | W | 7 | +1 | -110 | 21.43% | 44.43% | |||
11 | *-J Wiese,K Ostrowski-M Rzeszutek | 1 | NS | 4 | E | Q | -1 | +50 | 78.57% | 45.53% | ||
*-J Wiese,K Ostrowski-M Rzeszutek | 2 | NS | 3× | S | K | -2 | -500 | 42.86% | 45.45% | |||
*-J Wiese,K Ostrowski-M Rzeszutek | 3 | NS | 4 | E | 10 | +2 | -680 | 35.71% | 45.15% | |||
12 | *-J Wiese,R Menzfeld-M Chojnacki | 4 | NS | 3 | E | 7 | -1 | +100 | 100.00% | 46.76% | ||
*-J Wiese,R Menzfeld-M Chojnacki | 5 | NS | 3 | W | 5 | = | -400 | 50.00% | 46.86% | |||
*-J Wiese,R Menzfeld-M Chojnacki | 6 | NS | 5 | E | 8 | -2 | +200 | 57.14% | 47.14% | |||
13 | B Wegner-G Czapulak,*-J Wiese | 7 | WE | 4 | W | 4 | -1 | -100 | 14.29% | 46.25% | ||
B Wegner-G Czapulak,*-J Wiese | 8 | WE | 3 | W | 3 | = | +400 | 92.86% | 47.48% | |||
B Wegner-G Czapulak,*-J Wiese | 9 | WE | 5× | W | Q | -1 | -200 | 21.43% | 46.81% | |||
14 | H Pietrzykowska-T Pogwizd,*-J Wiese | 10 | WE | 4 | N | 4 | = | -130 | 50.00% | 46.89% | ||
H Pietrzykowska-T Pogwizd,*-J Wiese | 11 | WE | 3 | E | 8 | +2 | +460 | 92.86% | 48.01% | |||
H Pietrzykowska-T Pogwizd,*-J Wiese | 12 | WE | 4 | W | 4 | = | +420 | 64.29% | 48.40% | |||
15 | E Kasiński-L Urbańczyk,*-J Wiese | 13 | WE | 6 | W | A | = | +1430 | 71.43% | 48.94% | ||
E Kasiński-L Urbańczyk,*-J Wiese | 14 | WE | 3 | W | K | +2 | +200 | 85.71% | 49.77% | |||
E Kasiński-L Urbańczyk,*-J Wiese | 15 | WE | 4× | W | K | = | +590 | 100.00% | 50.89% | |||
SUMA: | 50.89% | |||||||||||
C-OVER: | 56.72% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 52.83% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 11 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2016-12-11 o 19:48:27